Skip to content

OCPBUGS-49383: [release-4.18] MGMT-19771: Convert IDS to proper IDMS manifest #9400

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9391

/assign trewest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 24, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: MGMT-19771

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9391

/assign trewest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from javipolo and tsorya January 24, 2025 16:49
@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 24, 2025

/cc @mresvanis @javipolo @eranco74

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from eranco74 and mresvanis January 24, 2025 16:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 24, 2025
@javipolo
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn f318404 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jan 27, 2025
@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-49382

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 27, 2025

@trewest: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-49383: [release-4.18] MGMT-19771: Convert IDS to proper IDMS manifest

In response to this:

/jira cherrypick OCPBUGS-49382

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] MGMT-19771: Convert IDS to proper IDMS manifest OCPBUGS-49383: [release-4.18] MGMT-19771: Convert IDS to proper IDMS manifest Jan 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 to target a version in 4.19.0, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9391

/assign trewest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@trewest: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 to target a version in 4.19.0, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 27, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@trewest: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @gpei

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from gpei January 27, 2025 19:31
@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@trewest: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (achuzhoy@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@trewest: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (achuzhoy@redhat.com), skipping review request.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@trewest
Copy link
Contributor

trewest commented Jan 27, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@trewest: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 is in the state ON_QA, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49382 targets the "4.19.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @achuzhoy

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from achuzhoy January 27, 2025 21:13
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: achuzhoy, mresvanis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@achuzhoy
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 27, 2025

@achuzhoy: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: []

In response to this:

/label cherry-pick-approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@gpei
Copy link
Contributor

gpei commented Jan 28, 2025

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 28, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c2482d1 into openshift:release-4.18 Jan 28, 2025
18 of 19 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-49383 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #9391

/assign trewest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-altinfra
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-altinfra-container-v4.18.0-202501280831.p0.gc2482d1.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-terraform-providers
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-terraform-providers-container-v4.18.0-202501280831.p0.gc2482d1.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-baremetal-installer
This PR has been included in build ose-baremetal-installer-container-v4.18.0-202501280831.p0.gc2482d1.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-installer-artifacts
This PR has been included in build ose-installer-artifacts-container-v4.18.0-202501280831.p0.gc2482d1.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

9 participants