-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
[release-4.16] OCPBUGS-35040: Power VS: Add ports needed for private clusters to security group #8546
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
When the publish strategy is Internal, we'll need to allow some extra ports.
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34969 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040. Will retitle bug to link to clone. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/approve |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sadasu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
/jira refresh |
@AshwinHIBM: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/jira refresh |
@sadasu: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: juliemathew. Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/override ci/prow/yaml-lint |
/override ci/prow/tf-lint |
/override ci/prow/shellcheck |
@sadasu: Overrode contexts on behalf of sadasu: ci/prow/yaml-lint In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@sadasu: Overrode contexts on behalf of sadasu: ci/prow/tf-lint In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@sadasu: Overrode contexts on behalf of sadasu: ci/prow/shellcheck In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
91f0e41
into
openshift:release-4.16
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35040 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-installer-altinfra |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-baremetal-installer |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-installer-terraform-providers |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-installer-artifacts |
Fix included in accepted release 4.16.0-0.nightly-2025-04-17-181855 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #8530
/assign mjturek